fonic_sight: (ninja eyes)
Jade Curtiss ([personal profile] fonic_sight) wrote 2012-07-09 04:13 am (UTC)

text;

You're right, that is quite simple. Just going off the number of years themselves as opposed to possibly changing or reoccurring natural events makes it much more orderly.

However, why not years divisible by an exact hundred? Is there an explanation for that?

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting